United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project. 

United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project. 

United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project. 

United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project. 

United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project. 

FWS announced its 12-month finding on a petition to list the peppered chub as endangered or threatened under the ESA; the agency found that listing is warranted and proposed to list the species as endangered and to designate critical habitat. 

FWS announced its 12-month finding on a petition to list the peppered chub as endangered or threatened under the ESA; the agency found that listing is warranted and proposed to list the species as endangered and to designate critical habitat. 

FWS announced its 12-month finding on a petition to list the peppered chub as endangered or threatened under the ESA; the agency found that listing is warranted and proposed to list the species as endangered and to designate critical habitat. 

FWS announced its 12-month finding on a petition to list the peppered chub as endangered or threatened under the ESA; the agency found that listing is warranted and proposed to list the species as endangered and to designate critical habitat. 

FWS announced its 12-month finding on a petition to list the peppered chub as endangered or threatened under the ESA; the agency found that listing is warranted and proposed to list the species as endangered and to designate critical habitat.