FWS proposed to list the whitebark pine as a threatened species under the ESA, and to issue a rule under §4(d) of the Act to provide for the conservation of the species.
FWS proposed to list the whitebark pine as a threatened species under the ESA, and to issue a rule under §4(d) of the Act to provide for the conservation of the species.
FWS proposed to list the whitebark pine as a threatened species under the ESA, and to issue a rule under §4(d) of the Act to provide for the conservation of the species.
FWS proposed to list the whitebark pine as a threatened species under the ESA, and to issue a rule under §4(d) of the Act to provide for the conservation of the species.
EPA announced it would not impose financial responsibility requirements under §108(b) of CERCLA for facilities in the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry, the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry, and the chemical manufacturing industry.
EPA announced it would not impose financial responsibility requirements under §108(b) of CERCLA for facilities in the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry, the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry, and the chemical manufacturing industry.
EPA announced it would not impose financial responsibility requirements under §108(b) of CERCLA for facilities in the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry, the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry, and the chemical manufacturing industry.
EPA announced it would not impose financial responsibility requirements under §108(b) of CERCLA for facilities in the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution industry, the petroleum and coal products manufacturing industry, and the chemical manufacturing industry.
United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project.
United States v. Seattle, City of, No.16-1486 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 12, 2020). A settling CERCLA, CWA, and OPA defendant that damaged natural resources by releasing hazardous substances from city facilities along the Lower Duwamish Waterway must purchase restoration credits, establish conservation easements on parcels along the waterway, pay $91,000 of the damage assessment costs, and pay to operate and maintain a restoration project.