EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA in Center for Biological Diversity v. Wheeler, No. 4:18-cv-03544 (N.D. Cal.), that establishes deadlines for the Agency to approve or disapprove several submitted sulfur dioxide (SO2) SIPs and issue findings of failure to submit SO2 SIPs for several areas.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA in Center for Biological Diversity v. Wheeler, No. 4:18-cv-03544 (N.D. Cal.), that establishes deadlines for the Agency to approve or disapprove several submitted sulfur dioxide (SO2) SIPs and issue findings of failure to submit SO2 SIPs for several areas.

EPA entered into a proposed consent decree under the CAA in Center for Biological Diversity v. Wheeler, No. 4:18-cv-03544 (N.D. Cal.), that establishes deadlines for the Agency to approve or disapprove several submitted sulfur dioxide (SO2) SIPs and issue findings of failure to submit SO2 SIPs for several areas.

EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA regarding the Lightman Drum Company Superfund site in Camden County, New Jersey.

EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA regarding the Lightman Drum Company Superfund site in Camden County, New Jersey.

EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA regarding the Lightman Drum Company Superfund site in Camden County, New Jersey.

EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA regarding the Lightman Drum Company Superfund site in Camden County, New Jersey.

EPA entered into a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement under CERCLA regarding the Lightman Drum Company Superfund site in Camden County, New Jersey.

United States v. Houston, Texas, City of, No. 4:18-cv-03368 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that illegally discharged wastewater via sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and discharged pollutants from wastewater treatment plants that exceeded effluent limits established in state-issued permits must implement comprehensive injunctive relief measures to eliminate both SSOs and effluent violations, as well as measures to prevent such violations, and pay a $4.4 million civil penalty.

United States v. Houston, Texas, City of, No. 4:18-cv-03368 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that illegally discharged wastewater via sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and discharged pollutants from wastewater treatment plants that exceeded effluent limits established in state-issued permits must implement comprehensive injunctive relief measures to eliminate both SSOs and effluent violations, as well as measures to prevent such violations, and pay a $4.4 million civil penalty.