Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Pennsylvania Envtl. Council v. Bartlett

District court's dismissal of action to enjoin the relocation of a highway in a state forest as a part of the federal aid secondary highway system is affirmed. Design hearings for this highway were not required by PPM 20-8 because that regulation exempts secondary roads built for less than 750 vehic...

Miller v. United States

Persons supplying information which leads to conviction under the Refuse Act have a statutory right to one-half of any fine imposed, and the court has no discretion to deny that award. Claimant's right to due process of law in the adjudication of their claim to one-half of the fine imposed upon the ...

Morningside-Lenox Park Ass'n v. Volpe

Federal Aid Interstate Highway 485 planned for Atlanta, Georgia, enjoined pending Secretary of Transportation's compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Although substantial federal approval of the project had occurred prior to the effective date of NEPA, actions to the taken af...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Tennessee Valley Auth.

Venue for a suit challenging TVA's policy of purchasing strip-mined coal without first complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 lies in the Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. §1391(e). One of the plaintiffs resides in the district and the suit does not involve ...

Kalur v. Resor

The regulations implementing the Refuse Act Permit Program, to the extent that they allow the issuance of permits to discharge refuse matter into non-navigable waterways are invalid, and the Secretary is permanently enjoined from issuing such permits. The Refuse Act prohibits the depositing of refus...

La Raza Unida v. Volpe

Implementation of plans to construct a primary highway, including acquisition-of-way, enjoined pending compliance with the Uniform Relocation and Assistance Act of 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and provisions of federal highway statutes, which prohibit the unwarranted destructi...

Michie v. Great Lakes Steel

Plaintiffs are more than 50 residents of Ontario, Canada, and defendants are three corporations located in Wayne County, Michigan. For further facts, see ELR Dig. [180]. Where the effects of defendants' alleged acts is a single, indivisible injury—here illness and property damage caused by air pol...

United States v. Jellico Indus., Inc.

The United States obtained a preliminary injunction pursuant to the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 prohibiting the defendant coal mine operators from discharging any strip mining runoff into navigable waters and prohibiting them from conducting any surface mining operations in a manner that would di...

Industry Task Force for DDT v. Department of Natural Resources

Association of DDT manufacturers do not have standing to challenge a ruling by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources that DDT is an environmental pollutant because the Wisconsin statute, which prohibits the sale or use of the pesticide in the state, eliminates their interest in the administr...

Inglewood v. Los Angeles

The $10,000 jurisdictional amount requirement for a class action brought by property owners and residents in the area of Los Angeles International Airport for damages caused by the unlawful operation of the airport ultimately must be satisfied by each member of the class. However, the requirement is...