Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

New York v. Oyster Bay, Town of

The court approves a consent decree in an action brought by the state of New York under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and state law to require a town and several corporate defendants to remedy the hazardous waste problems at a landfill operated by...

Verlan, Ltd. v. John L. Armitage & Co.

The court, applying Illinois law, holds that claims for response costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) are not "damages" under a comprehensive general liability insurance policy. CERCLA cost recovery actions do not seek damages, but seek the e...

New York, City of v. Exxon Corp.

The court upholds, for the most part, a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) proposed settlement between New York City and several contributors to five city landfills. The settlement was challenged by two nonsettling contributors. The court first holds that ...

National Wildlife Fed'n v. Burford

The court holds that an environmental group lacks standing in its challenge seeking to prohibit the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from lifting development restrictions on 180 million acres of public land, and lifts a preliminary injunction that had been in place for almost three years. Plaintiff h...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA

The court holds that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have a non-discretionary duty under Clean Air Act §112 to propose an emission standard for all remaining sources of benzene emissions, but must either propose a standard or issue a final determination as to why a specific sourc...

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha

The court holds that the defendants, owners, and past operators of a landfill listed on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act's (CERCLA) National Priorities List, must afford certain third parties, who entered into a consent decree with the Environmental Protectio...

Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.

On remand from the Ninth Circuit, the court holds that a violation is ongoing for purposes of a citizen suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) if the same parameter has been exceeded or if a violation recurs and the cause has not been completely eradicated. The court first holds ...

Hazen Paper Co. v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co.

The court holds that comprehensive general liability insurance covers liability for response costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Materials Release, Prevention, and Response Act. The court first holds that the i...

Portland Audubon Soc'y v. Hodel

The court holds that a coalition of timber industry groups may not intervene as a defendant concerning plaintiffs' claim that the Bureau of Land Management violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement for Oregon timber mana...

Portland Audubon Soc'y v. Hodel

The court holds that a congressional continuing resolution limiting judicial review of Bureau of Land Management timber management plans does not necessarily preclude a challenge to timber sales in old growth timber stands in Oregon that provide habitat for the northern spotted owl. The resolution w...