Dan Tarlock and Sarah Bates provide an excellent reprise of the West's historical resistance to the notion that water scarcity in the region should in any way inhibit growth. In Western Growth and Sustainable Water Use: If There Are No "Natural Limits," Should We Worry About Water Supplies? (No Natural Limits), they provide a powerful brief for the increased importance of linking population growth and water availability, noting recent attempts by some jurisdictions to move in that direction.

Editors' Summary

Editors' Summary

Editor's Summary: In 1984, EPA became the first federal agency to adopt an Indian policy. Congress subsequently affirmed the policy by authorizing the Agency to treat Indian tribes as states under the SDWA, the CWA, and the CAA. EPA's adoption of a common-law inherent authority test to determine jurisdiction under the statutes spawned a treat-as-states (TAS) process that requires a detailed review of factual information about each tribe.

Editors' Summary: The looming specter of climate change has sent industry racing to develop ways to reduce carbon emissions. Ethanol is one fuel now touted as a new and cleaner alternative to gasoline. Ethanol, however, already has a long history as a gasoline additive under the CAA's reformulated gasoline regulations. In this Article, Prof. Arnold W. Reitze explains the history of fuel additive requirements under the CAA, focusing on the particular problems of each type of gasoline additive.

Editor's Summary: When state or local government entities sue the federal government under the CAA, they can find themselves barred by the doctrine of federal sovereign immunity, which prevents suit against the U.S. government. They must find an applicable statutory provision that waives sovereign immunity and is applicable to their case to survive a motion to dismiss. This author analyzes whether sovereign immunity is waived under the CAA as to punitive civil penalties in enforcement actions brought by states and local governments.

Editors' Summary: David P. Novello surveys the significant developments in hazardous air pollutant (HAP) regulation in this Article. Since early 2007, EPA has suffered significant reversals in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C.) Circuit concerning its HAP regulatory program, including the remand of three national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. In early 2008, the D.C. Circuit also ruled invalid EPA's decision on how to regulate mercury emissions from electric utilities.

Editor's Summary: On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected one of EPA's major CAA rulemaking initiatives--the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). The ruling came as a surprise to both environmental groups and industry alike, and has, at least temporarily, thrown the status of air quality regulation for several key air pollutants in the eastern United States into disarray.

1. Do Endangered Species Act Challenges Still Have Teeth?

William Robert Irvin, M. Reed Hopper, Mark C. Rutzick, David J. Hayes (moderator)

2. What Roles Should Federal and State Governments Play in Fighting Air Pollution?

Jeffrey R. Holmstead, Peter Lehner, Howard A. Learner, Leslie Sue Ritts (moderator)

3. Who Should Pay for Food Safety? Bob Hibbert, Richard Samp, Wenonah Hauter, Douglas T. Kendall (moderator)

This panel is sponsored by the Environmental Law Institute.

Editors' Summary