SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
SIP Proposal: Arizona (volatile organic compound emissions from surface coating operations in Maricopa County).
United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-02559-RBJ (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2020). A settling CAA defendant that failed to adequately design, operate, and maintain vapor control systems at the condensate tank systems it owned and operated in the Denver-Julesburg Basin ground-level ozone nonattainment area in Colorado, which resulted in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other pollutants into the atmosphere, must implement injunctive relief at 67 condensate tank systems to ensure that its vapor control systems adequately capture and control potential VOC emissions, pay a $1 million civil penalty split evenly between the United States and Colorado, and undertake projects to mitigate environmental harm.
United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-02559-RBJ (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2020). A settling CAA defendant that failed to adequately design, operate, and maintain vapor control systems at the condensate tank systems it owned and operated in the Denver-Julesburg Basin ground-level ozone nonattainment area in Colorado, which resulted in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other pollutants into the atmosphere, must implement injunctive relief at 67 condensate tank systems to ensure that its vapor control systems adequately capture and control potential VOC emissions, pay a $1 million civil penalty split evenly between the United States and Colorado, and undertake projects to mitigate environmental harm.
United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-02559-RBJ (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2020). A settling CAA defendant that failed to adequately design, operate, and maintain vapor control systems at the condensate tank systems it owned and operated in the Denver-Julesburg Basin ground-level ozone nonattainment area in Colorado, which resulted in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other pollutants into the atmosphere, must implement injunctive relief at 67 condensate tank systems to ensure that its vapor control systems adequately capture and control potential VOC emissions, pay a $1 million civil penalty split evenly between the United States and Colorado, and undertake projects to mitigate environmental harm.
United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-02559-RBJ (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2020). A settling CAA defendant that failed to adequately design, operate, and maintain vapor control systems at the condensate tank systems it owned and operated in the Denver-Julesburg Basin ground-level ozone nonattainment area in Colorado, which resulted in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other pollutants into the atmosphere, must implement injunctive relief at 67 condensate tank systems to ensure that its vapor control systems adequately capture and control potential VOC emissions, pay a $1 million civil penalty split evenly between the United States and Colorado, and undertake projects to mitigate environmental harm.