EPA announced the requirements under the America's Water Infrastructure Act for community water systems serving more than 3,300 persons to complete risk and resilience assessments and emergency response plans; the Agency also outlined how community water systems can certify the completion of these documents to EPA.

United States v. New York, City of, No. 1:19-cv-01519-RJD-CLP (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2019). A settling SDWA defendant that failed to place a cover over its Hillview Reservoir, a 90-acre treated-water reservoir in Yonkers, New York, must build the cover, pay the United States a $1 million civil penalty, pay New York a $50,000 civil penalty, and perform a state water quality benefit project.

United States v. New York, City of, No. 1:19-cv-01519-RJD-CLP (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2019). A settling SDWA defendant that failed to place a cover over its Hillview Reservoir, a 90-acre treated-water reservoir in Yonkers, New York, must build the cover, pay the United States a $1 million civil penalty, pay New York a $50,000 civil penalty, and perform a state water quality benefit project.

United States v. New York, City of, No. 1:19-cv-01519-RJD-CLP (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2019). A settling SDWA defendant that failed to place a cover over its Hillview Reservoir, a 90-acre treated-water reservoir in Yonkers, New York, must build the cover, pay the United States a $1 million civil penalty, pay New York a $50,000 civil penalty, and perform a state water quality benefit project.

United States v. New York, City of, No. 1:19-cv-01519-RJD-CLP (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2019). A settling SDWA defendant that failed to place a cover over its Hillview Reservoir, a 90-acre treated-water reservoir in Yonkers, New York, must build the cover, pay the United States a $1 million civil penalty, pay New York a $50,000 civil penalty, and perform a state water quality benefit project.

United States v. Toledo, Ohio, City of, No. 3:19-cv-601-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2019). Under a proposed consent decree concerning the Ottawa River Natural Resources Assessment site in Toledo, Ohio, a settling CERCLA and CWA defendant must implement and maintain a restoration project; finance DOI's implementation of a second restoration project and deed property to DOI to enable the agency to maintain wetlands located on DOI property; pay restoration oversight costs to DOI and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; and pay the United States and Ohio $420,000 in past natural resources damage assessment costs.

United States v. Toledo, Ohio, City of, No. 3:19-cv-601-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2019). Under a proposed consent decree concerning the Ottawa River Natural Resources Assessment site in Toledo, Ohio, a settling CERCLA and CWA defendant must implement and maintain a restoration project; finance DOI's implementation of a second restoration project and deed property to DOI to enable the agency to maintain wetlands located on DOI property; pay restoration oversight costs to DOI and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; and pay the United States and Ohio $420,000 in past natural resources damage assessment costs.

United States v. Toledo, Ohio, City of, No. 3:19-cv-601-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2019). Under a proposed consent decree concerning the Ottawa River Natural Resources Assessment site in Toledo, Ohio, a settling CERCLA and CWA defendant must implement and maintain a restoration project; finance DOI's implementation of a second restoration project and deed property to DOI to enable the agency to maintain wetlands located on DOI property; pay restoration oversight costs to DOI and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; and pay the United States and Ohio $420,000 in past natural resources damage assessment costs.

United States v. Toledo, Ohio, City of, No. 3:19-cv-601-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2019). Under a proposed consent decree concerning the Ottawa River Natural Resources Assessment site in Toledo, Ohio, a settling CERCLA and CWA defendant must implement and maintain a restoration project; finance DOI's implementation of a second restoration project and deed property to DOI to enable the agency to maintain wetlands located on DOI property; pay restoration oversight costs to DOI and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; and pay the United States and Ohio $420,000 in past natural resources damage assessment costs.

United States v. Toledo, Ohio, City of, No. 3:19-cv-601-JGC (N.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2019). Under a proposed consent decree concerning the Ottawa River Natural Resources Assessment site in Toledo, Ohio, a settling CERCLA and CWA defendant must implement and maintain a restoration project; finance DOI's implementation of a second restoration project and deed property to DOI to enable the agency to maintain wetlands located on DOI property; pay restoration oversight costs to DOI and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; and pay the United States and Ohio $420,000 in past natural resources damage assessment costs.