The court holds that the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) prepared by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the use of herbicides to control noxious weeds on public lands in five northwest states satisfies the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act's (NEPA's) worst...

The court holds that plaintiffs are entitled to attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Plaintiffs challenged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) "backfit" rule, which the court vacated in an earlier ruling. The court holds that plaintiffs were the prevailing party, since...

The court holds that the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) decision to permit the continued sale and use of existing stocks of chlordane and heptachlor, pursuant to an agreement in which the manufacturer voluntarily cancelled registrations, was arbitrary and capricious, and contrary to law. ...

The court holds that defendant Occidental Chemical Corporation is strictly, jointly, and severally liable under §107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) for response costs incurred by the United States and New York at the Love Canal waste disposa...

The court affirms a district court decision, 17 ELR 20511, holding that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts Maryland county regulations requiring commercial pesticide applicators to post sprayed areas and provide notification of pesticide hazards because FIFRA al...

The court rules that Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) §6001 and Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) §313 waive the federal government's sovereign immunity from civil penalties imposed by states. RCRA §6001 waives sovereign immunity for "procedural requirements," and the court...

The court holds environmental groups are not entitled to judicial review of the final land and resource management plan (LRMP) for Texas national forests because they have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies with the Forest Service, but the Forest Service's denial of plaintiffs' request ...

The court holds that a municipal corporation is not a "person" subject to the requirements of the Endangered Species Act. Although the Act defines "person" as including "instrumentalities" of political subdivisions, a municipal corporation cannot be considered both a political subdivision and an ins...

The court holds that a report jointly issued by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommending that "supplied air" respirators be used for asbestos exposure is nonbinding and purely informational, and its publication does ...

The court holds that the Air Force is not required to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on the environmental impacts of nuclear war in connection with the installation of radio towers that are part of the Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN), a communications grid designed to function ...