The National Environmental Policy Act is applicable to projects even when the basic federal action has taken place prior to NEPA's effective date so long as some federal approval or action remains undone. In the case of the Park Free-West project in Milwaukee, although 99% of the proposed right-of-w...

There is little or no reason to require more than a nominal bond from plaintiffs who are seeking to enjoin a stream channelization project on the grounds that no adequate impact statement had been filed. The plaintiffs, who have no financial stake in the controversy, are acting as private attorneys ...

The United States may seek an injunction under the Refuse Act requiring operators of lake vessels to observe detailed antipollution regulations including use of certified personnel and installation of safety appliances. Under the rule enunciated in Illinois v. City of Milwaukee, 2 ELR 20201 (U.S. 19...

The Illinois Pollution Control Board has statutory authority to order a municipality or sanitary district to abate pollution in violation of the 1970 Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 111 1/2, Sec. 1040) and to authorize such municipalities or sanitary districts to issue gen...

The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. §§135 et seq., grants no authority to the EPA Administrator to issue an "order" regulating the use to which Mirex or any other pesticide which is properly registered may be put by public officials or private individuals, including t...

The plaintiffs, suing for a temporary restraining order to prevent the Secretary of Agriculture from trading national forest land for a larger plot owned by a railroad, have failed to demonstrate that the Secretary's actions were arbitrary or capricious. The plaintiffs had the opportunity and in fac...

This is one of the earliest cases based upon the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The court grants a stay pending appeal to the Fifth Circuit. While the extensive federal project opposed by the plaintiffs is not described, there is apparently no disagreement that proceeding with constructio...

The decision of a trial court or an appellate court, denying a preliminary injunction partially on the grounds that plaintiffs were not likely to prevail on the merits, does not so establish the "law of the case" as to estop either the parties or the court from proceeding with the case on its merits...

A broad view of "interests" and "adequate representation" should be taken when interpreting Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly in environmental questions. Intervention by parties with differing interests permits differing approaches to be considered by the court. Certain M...

Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, an exchange of lands by the Secretary of Interior is not reviewable by the courts. The Secretary of Interior has full authority to make an exchange under 16 U.S.C. §668dd, and, even if he errs in fact or in law, the courts have no jurisdiction to interfere....