Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

United States v. Smith

A landowner's dredging of a creek, filling of marshlands adjacent to his property, and construction of a bulkhead below the mean high water line without permits from the Corps of Engineers violates both the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972...

Sierra Club v. Morton

The court orders Interior Department officials to prepare, consider, and disseminate environmental impact statements on annual proposals for financing the National Wildlife Refuge System, after finding that such proposals are proposals for legislation within the meaning of §102(2)(C) of NEPA, and a...

Potomac River Ass'n v. Lundeberg Md. Seamanship Sch., Inc.

The court denies a private landowner's motion to dismiss a suit under the Rivers and Harbors Act seeking damages for harm to oyster beds and aesthetic enjoyment of a creek caused by allegedly illegal dredge, fill, and bulkheading activities. Plaintiffs may, insofar as they have alleged obstructions ...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Train

The EPA Administrator acted illegally in exempting discharges from certain classes of point sources including storm sewers, silvicultural facilities, relatively small animal confinement facilities, and irrigation return flows, from the Nation Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirement...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Train

Section 208(a)(6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 requires a state to act as the areawide waste treatment management planning agency for non-designated portions of the state in the same manner as waste treatment planning organizations designated for certain portions of ...

Friends of the Earth v. Coleman

On appeal from partial denial of plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, the court of appeals concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to extend to the nonfederally funded elements of a state's airport expansion and development plan an injunction against cons...

Sierra Club v. Drain

The court grants in part and denies in part defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim, a suit seeking to halt construction of a 650-megawatt coal-burning power plant in western Nebraska. Plaintiff Sierra Club, which has standing to maintain this action, contends that a state constr...

Pye v. Department of Transp. of Ga.

NEPA makes no provision for awarding damages or restitution to a private party. A landowner therefore cannot recover such compensation under the statute for state condemnation of 0.4 acres of his land for use in a planned federally funded highway project. The court also rules that when a state court...

Sierra Club v. Froehlke

After a full trial on the merits, the court denies plaintiffs' plea for injunctive and declaratory relief against an Army Corps of Engineers project to build a dam on the Meramec River near St. Louis and awards defendants costs. In finding all plaintiff's allegations of noncompliance with NEPA, the ...

Sierra Club v. Morton

Attempts by the Departments of Interior and Agriculture and the Army Corps of Engineers to control the development of coal resources in the Northern Great Plains show that a regional program of major federal action is contemplated, for which preparation of a programmatic NEPA impact statement may be...