Weekly Cases Update Volume 42, Issue 10

The cases listed below appear in the most recent issue of ELR's Weekly Update. For cases previously reported, please use the filter on the left.

Volume 42, Issue 22

ELR 2016411-3103, -3139(8th Cir., )

The Eighth Circuit held that costs a developer incurred to reduce pollution on a property it owns in Brainerd, Minnesota, that had formerly been owned by a railway company were not removal costs and thus not recoverable under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA).

Keywords:
Hazardous, Environmental Response and Liability Act