H.R. 8123
would prohibit federal funding for the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate.
would prohibit federal funding for the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate.
would amend Title 51, U.S. Code, to direct the Administrator of NASA to establish an initiative to conduct research, development, and demonstration on technologies capable of reducing both greenhouse gas emissions and noise emissions from aircraft.
would provide for advancements in carbon removal research, quantification, and commercialization, including by harnessing natural processes.
would prevent catastrophic wildland fires by establishing a commission to study and recommend wildland fire prevention, mitigation, suppression, management, and rehabilitation policies for the federal government.
would provide for congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to "The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors".
would reauthorize funding for the Reclamation Climate Change and Water Program.
would improve response to, and preparation for, heat waves and extreme heat.
On February 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the landmark West Virginia v. EPA case, involving the scope of powers delegated to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Clean Air Act. The Court’s decision will affect administrative law, and could have major consequences for environmental law, particularly the Agency’s power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and take action on climate change. On March 1, the Environmental Law Institute hosted a panel of leading experts to discuss the case, the arguments, and what form the decision may take. This Dialogue presents a transcript of that discussion, which has been edited for style, clarity, and space considerations.
You are not logged in. To access this content: