Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Lefrancois v. Rhode Island

The court holds that a statute prohibiting the deposit of out-of-state solid waste in a state-funded and -operated landfill does not violate the Commerce Clause, the Contract Clause, or the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Constitution. The court first holds that the statutory ban does not vi...

Quaker State Corp. v. U.S. Coast Guard

The court rules that the "owner or operator" under §311(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) is determined by the date of the discharge discovery. The court first holds that the government failed to prove that Quaker State owned the site after the discharges were discovered in 1985...

Mall Properties, Inc. v. Marsh

The court holds that the district court's remand to the Army Corps of Engineers of a challenge to the Corps' denial of a dredge and fill permit is not an appealable order. Plaintiff developer brought suit to challenge the Corps' decision to deny plaintiff a permit under §404 of the Federal Water Po...

Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. Sachs

On remand from the Supreme Court with instructions to consider the issue of mootness, the court holds that an electric power company's action for declaratory judgment that the Toxic Substances Control Act preempts Maryland hazardous waste statutes is rendered moot by Maryland's suspension of its cri...

United States v. Freeman

The court holds that the Eleventh Amendment precludes suits by private parties against a state in federal court for indemnification and contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The court first holds that the language of the 1986 CERCLA am...

South Macomb Disposal Auth. v. EPA

The court rules that §113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) bars constitutional challenges to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) by potentially responsible parties prior to an enforcement suit for reimbursement. The clear lang...

United States v. Nicolet, Inc.

The court holds the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §362(a), does not apply to a federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act cost recovery action brought by the United States government. An automatic stay does not apply when one of the go...

United States v. Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc.

The court denies the federal government's motion under §104(e)(5) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for immediate entry to enjoin defendants from continuing landfilling operations at the Northside Sanitary Landfill site. The court first holds that the Envi...

United States v. General Motors Corp.

The court rules that the Clean Air Act's four-month limitation on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) approval of state implementation plans (SIPs) applies to the Agency's decisions on proposed SIP revisions, and EPA is prohibited from enforcing an original SIP until it acts on a proposed ...

United States v. Farber

The court rules that the seller of hazardous substances that are not wastes can be held liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), but the mere sale of a hazardous substance by the supplier of raw materials to a company that used those ingredient...