Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Beaufort-Jasper County Water Auth. v. Corps of Eng'rs

The court holds that the Army Corps of Engineers acted reasonably in deciding not to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) before issuing permits under Federal Water Pollution Control Act §404 and Rivers and Harbors Act §10 for the installation of intake and outfall pipes and a barge unl...

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Gorsuch

The court rules that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) erred in partially approving a 1974 Indiana state implementation plan (SIP) revision with the effect of making the SIP provision significantly more stringent than the state intended. Initially the court rules that the legality of EPA's 1...

Carson-Truckee Water Conservancy Dist. v. Clark

The court rules that the Secretary of the Interior did not abuse his discretion in deciding to devote all water from a reclamation project to the conservation of endangered species. The court vacates the district court's holding on the Secretary's obligation to obtain reimbursement of project costs ...

United States v. Ward

The court holds, in an action under §§104 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) to recover state and federal response costs incurred in cleaning up polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) sprayed along North Carolina roadsides, that a third party ac...

Hybud Equip. Corp. v. Akron, City of

The court holds Akron's ordinance monopolizing solid waste disposal exempt from the Sherman Antitrust Act as state action. The city passed the ordinance to fulfill an agreement with the Ohio Water Development Agency (OWDA), which financed the city's solid-waste-fueled Recycle Energy System. The cour...

Dedham Water Co. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.

The court holds that plaintiff in this groundwater contamination suit has constructively complied with the 60-day notice requirements in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ...

Cities Serv. Pipe Line Co. v. United States

The court holds that appellant pipeline company is not entitled to recover its oil spill cleanup costs under §311(i)(1)(D) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), because its failure to use reasonable care to detect and repair the damage caused by a third party contributed to the ruptur...

Dow Chem. Co. v. United States ex rel. Burford

The court rules that aerial surveillance of Dow's plant by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) inspectors searching for Clean Air Act violations does not constitute a Fourth Amendment search and is within EPA's statutory authority. The court initially rules that, contrary to the district court's a...

Ced's, Inc. v. EPA

The court holds that Clean Air Act §114(a) empowers the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to inspect the ordinary business records of an automobile parts manufacturer that could be causing others to use its products to tamper with vehicle emission control systems unlawfully. Ced's manufactures ...

ASARCO, Inc. v. OSHA

The court rules that the Occupational Health and Safety Administration's (OSHA's) maximum permissible exposure level (PEL) for airborne arsenic nonferrous metal smelting facilities is supported by substantial evidence. The court first upholds OSHA's conclusion that the current PEL of 500 micrograms ...