Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Citizen Advocates for Responsible Expansion v. Dole

The court holds that planners of the I-35W and I-30 highway expansions in Fort Worth violated the National Environmental Policy Act, the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act, and the Federal-Aid Highways Act (FAHA) when they transferred the "Overhead," a segment of the I-30 project, to the I-35W p...

Wagner Elec. Corp. v. Thomas

The court rules that §106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which makes persons violating cleanup orders potentially liable for punitive damages, incorporates a good-faith exemption and does not violate due process.
The court rules that it lacks...

Colorado v. ASARCO, Inc.

The court holds that the plaintiff's Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) response cost and natural resource damage claims are not barred and that the governor of Colorado properly authorized the state attorney general to bring the suit. The court first rule...

Chesapeake Bay Found. v. American Recovery Co.

The court dismisses as moot an appeal from district court decisions dismissing a citizen suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) and denying citizen intervention in a subsequent federal enforcement suit, but notes that the citizen suit was neither barred by the government enforcem...

In re Dant & Russell, Inc.

The court holds that a lessor may not claim administrative priority for the costs of cleaning up a bankrupt lessee's hazardous waste site. The court first holds that a lease signed after the debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy is avoidable as an unauthorized postpetition transaction. A debtor may...

Commonwealth v. Scatena

The court holds that defendants were properly convicted of the Model Penal Code felony of risking a catastrophe on evidence that they discharged large quantities of hazardous wastes into an abandoned mine that drained into a major public water supply. The court holds that to be guilty of the offense...

Department of Envtl. Regulation v. Goldring

The court holds that the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) properly extended its landward jurisdiction over dredge and fill activities to areas with designated aquatic plant species where there is a one-way flow of freshwater over the property and into state waters. Neither the re...

Exxon Corp. v. Hunt

The Court rules that §114(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) preempts state superfunds financed by special taxes and used to pay expenses that could be paid under CERCLA. Section 114(c) states that it preempts funds used to pay "costs of respons...

Conant v. United States

The court holds that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) requires a farmer to obtain a §404 permit from the Corps of Engineers before discharging dredge and fill material into wetlands on his property for the construction of a fish pond, that the wetlands in question are navigable water...

Dunn v. United States

The court rules that the provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) requiring that fee petitions be filed within 30 days of final judgment requires only that the fee petition itself be filed with the court by that time, and that pleadings detailing the amount requested may be filed subseque...