Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade Comm'n

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must prepare a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) impact statement in connection with an enforcement proceeding seeking divestiture of certain pipelines and refining capacity by nine oil companies. The companies have standing to maintain this action under NEP...

Odom v. Deltona Corp.

Affirming the trial court's grant of plaintiff-appellee's motion for summary judgment, the court rejects alleged state reservation of title in non-meandered lakes within lands held by paper title for more than 30 years by plaintiff development company.
Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment agains...

Matthews, Town of v. Department of Transp.

The court enjoins acquisition of land and construction of highway improvements pending preparation of an adequate environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act. Plaintiff has standing to bring this suit under City of Davis v. Coleman, 5 ELR 20633 (9th Cir. 1975). T...

United Family Farmers, Inc. v. Kleppe

Affirming the lower court's grant of summary judgment for defendants, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals blocks plaintiffs' attempts to enjoin construction of the Oahe Diversion Unit of the Missouri River Basin Project. The Oahe Unit is intended to divert water from an existing reservoir for indust...

Island Properties, Inc. v. Martha's Vineyard Comm'n

Regulatory land use controls adopted by Martha's Vineyard Commission, being regional in scope, supersede a less restrictive local zoning bylaw. Plaintiff owns undeveloped parcels near Sengekontacket Pond, a major tidal pond on Martha's Vineyard, and had planned to develop the parcels pursuant to the...

Smith-Southwest Indus. v. Friendswood Dev. Co.

In a case of first impression in Texas dealing directly with land subsidence caused by withdrawal of groundwater, the court holds that if a landowner negligently withdraws water from his property so that the withdrawal is the proximate cause of subsidence of another's land, the fact that he owns the...

People ex rel. Scott v. Chicago Park Dist.

The Illinois Supreme Court holds that a statute conveying 194.6 acres of Lake Michigan submerged lands to United States Steel violates the public trust doctrine. The statute, passed in 1963, was challenged by a taxpayer, whose suit was dismissed for lack of standing. Droste v. Kerner, 34 Ill. 2d 495...

United States v. California

The Ninth Circuit affirms a lower court's judgment, 6 ELR 20120, that §8 of the Reclamation Act of 1902 does not require the United States to obtain from the California State Water Resources Control Board a permit to appropriate unappropriated water from the Stanislaus River for the New Melones dam...

Save Our Wetlands v. Corps of Eng'rs

The Fifth Circuit affirms a lower court's judgment that plaintiffs' suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against dredging in Lake Pontchartrain by a developer is barred by laches. Plaintiffs alleged that the Corps had issued a dredging permit to the developer pursuant to §10 of the Rivers...

Robinson v. Knebel

The court affirms a lower court's judgment that the amplified final environmental impact statement prepared by the Soil Conservation Service in connection with the proposed Cane Creek Recreational Development fully complies within the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).Plai...