Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Sierra Club v. Hickel

Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, an exchange of lands by the Secretary of Interior is not reviewable by the courts. The Secretary of Interior has full authority to make an exchange under 16 U.S.C. §668dd, and, even if he errs in fact or in law, the courts have no jurisdiction to interfere....

Air Transp. Ass'n v. Inglewood

The pervasiveness of federal regulation in the field of air commerce, the intensity of the national interest in this regulation, and the nature of air commerce itself require the unavoidable conclusion that state and local regulation in that area has been preempted. A state or local government canno...

Maryland v. Amerada Hess Corp.

A federal district court has admiralty jurisdiction in a suit by a state for damages to compensate for injury to its waters by an oil discharge from the defendants' shore facility. In this type of case the tort takes place, not where the negligent act occurs but, rather, where the act or omission be...

Thompson v. Fugate

State highway planners cannot evade the requirements of NEPA, the National Historic Preservation Act, §4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act and other federal directives, by so segmenting a proposed highway that certain sections do not have federal aid requests. The beltway around Richmond, ...

Keith v. Volpe

This is an order denying a motion by defendants to amend the preliminary injunction granted against the construction of the Century Freeway (I-105) in Los Angeles County. That injunction, granted July 7, 1972, and the opinion supporting it, are found at 2 ELR 20425. Much of the present opinion is a ...

Pizitz, Inc. v. Volpe

Certain parties are permitted to intervene out of time as amicus curiae, and their motion to strike a paragraph of the opinion of the Circuit Court, on the ground that the issue discussed is not necessary to the decision, is granted. The offending paragraph concerned the state's preparation of a NEP...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA

The D.C. Circuit is the "appropriate circuit" pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1857c-5 (the Clean Air Act) to determine questions that are common to all state implementation plans approved by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. Where, in every state implementation plan, the Administrato...

Scientists' Inst. for Pub. Info. v. Atomic Energy Comm'n

The Atomic Energy Commission does not have to file an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act concerning its research and development program on the liquid metal fast breeder reactor. Only when a demonstration plant is built must such an impact statement be filed, ...

American Can Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n

Oregon's 1971 Bottle Bill, outlawing tab-top cans and imposing a minimum refund value for all other beer and soft-drink containers, is held constitutional. Plaintiffs, container manufacturers, bottlers, and out-of-state breweries, seek to have the act declared unconstitutional on five grounds: that ...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Grant

Upon reconsideration of its order that plaintiffs be required to post a $75,000 security bond to maintain a preliminary injunction against the Chicod Creek Watershed project (2 ELR 20185), the court denies plaintiffs' motion to reduce the bond to a $100 nominal amount within the plaintiff's financia...