Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Fort Pierre, City of v. United Fire & Casualty Co.

The court holds that an insurer had no duty under a public officials errors and omissions policy to defend an insured against suit by the federal government for allegedly filling a wetland without a Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) §404 permit. The Corps of Engineers issued a cease and d...

Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Baldwin County Comm'n

The court holds that the trial court did not err in reversing the Alabama Environmental Management Commission's (AEMC's) denial of a stay of a permit allowing an oil company to discharge drilling fluids from a well in Alabama's coastal waters. The Alabama Department of Environmental Management issue...

Public Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Witco Chem. Corp.

The court holds that a preexisting state environmental enforcement action and a civil penalty assessment against a chemical company do not bar a citizen suit under §505 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) for alleged violations of the company's pollutant discharge permit. The court h...

Public Interest Research Group of N.J. v. Witco Chem. Corp.

The court holds that the five-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. §2462 does not begin to run in a Federal Water Pollution Control Act citizen suit until the date the defendant files its discharge monitoring reports, and not from the date of violation. A plaintiff's cause of action accrues at ...

Transportation Leasing Co. v. California

The court holds that household waste is not exempt from inclusion as a "hazardous substance" under §101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). In an attempt to escape liability under CERCLA §107(a)(3) for arranging to dispose of hazardous substan...

National Audubon Soc'y v. U.S. Forest Serv.

The court enjoins four timber sales in the Rogue River National Forest pending the Forest Service's completion of environmental impact statements (EISs) analyzing the consequences of the timber sales on the lands. A portion of the lands on which the timber sales were to have taken place are roadless...

United States v. Hobbs

The court denies defendants' post-trial motions for a new trial and judgments notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) after a jury found that defendants discharged pollutants onto their wetlands without a Corps of Engineers permit in violation of §301(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA...

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

The court holds that the South Carolina Beachfront Management Act's prohibition of the construction of any permanent structure seaward of a setback line did not work a taking without just compensation of respondent landowner's use of two vacant oceanfront lots. The lower court found that a regulator...

Environmental Defense Fund v. Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc.

The court holds that the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments do not moot a suit alleging that residue ash produced by waste-to-energy facilities should be regulated as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Section 306 of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments provides that ...

Bill Kettlewell Excavating, Inc. v. Michigan Dep't of Natural Resources

The court holds that 1988 amendments to the Michigan Solid Waste Management Act requiring county approval for disposal of out-of-county waste do not violate the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court holds that the amendments do not serve an economic protectionist purpose prohibited by ...