Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Worst Case and the Deepwater Horizon Blowout: There Ought to Be a Law

There is a law. In fact, there are three laws that, jointly and severally, should have anticipated and provided measures to prevent and cope with the explosion of the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon. Instead, we have 11 deaths, 17 serious injuries, the release of an American record 2.6 million gallons of oil, an equivalent record for chemical dispersants, months of Mutt `n' Jeff responses, enormous corporate losses, and the ensuing pain of the Gulf Coast region.

Learning From Disasters: Twenty-One Years After the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Will Reactions to the Deepwater Horizon Blowout Finally Address the Systemic Flaws Revealed in Alaska?

Twenty-one years ago, after the calamitous Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS) in Alaska's Prince William Sound, the pervasive systemic flaws--that, according to the State of Alaska Oil Spill Commission, had made a major calamity not just possible but probable1--were largely cloaked behind the figure of a captain with a drinking problem.

How Environmental Regulators Can Address Human Factors in Oil Spill Prevention Using Crew Resource Management

Oil is released into the environment from natural seeps and from human activities involved in the exploration, production, transportation, and refinement of oil and its distillation. The effect of oil on the marine environment depends on many factors including the type of oil and the characteristics of the environment into which the oil is released, along with related climatic and meteorological phenomena.

The Policy and Regulatory Response to Deepwater Horizon: Transforming Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing?

Since the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon exploded and sank into the Gulf of Mexico in late April 2010, the resulting oil spill and the events that may have contributed to the disaster have captured the attention of the general public, as well as government officials, on a historic scale. Despite the length of time that has passed since the incident, the environmental, operational, and regulatory impact of the spill, and the full range of public and privatesector responses, remains to an extent uncertain.

The Importance of Determining Potential Chronic Natural Resource Damages From the Deepwater Horizon Accident

Now that BP has stopped the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon rig, scientists and regulators are in the initial stages of making a concerted effort to determine where the oil (and dispersants) went, in what form, and what, if anything, this means to the biota of the Gulf. Biologists, ecologists, and other scientists have the gargantuan task of trying to sort out, characterize, and quantify the scope and degree of the biological effects of the spill on Gulf and estuarine ecosystems.

The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Seafood Prices

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a disaster of major proportions. The commercial and natural resources damages that will arise from the spill may ultimately be similarly significant. The Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 is often compared as the closest, if imperfect, historical example of how the Gulf spill will be treated. After the Exxon Valdez spill, fishermen claimed pure economic damages related to alleged depression of seafood prices in addition to losses from forgone catch in closed fisheries.

Lessons From the BP Emergency Action Plan in Action

I. Premises

Failures, disasters, and tragedies occur. Catastrophic oil spills or toxic releases, mechanical breakdowns, technology failures, or software glitches may appear to be accidents, intentional acts, or environmental disasters, but almost always, human error will be involved. The human fault may occur in project design, construction, supervision, operations, maintenance, repairs and modifications, inspections, and/ or regulation. Emergency action plans (EAPs) can minimize the impact of human fault.

Designing the Gulf Coast Claims Facility in the Shadow of the Law: A Template From the Superfund §301(e) Report

About two months after the Deepwater Horizon explosion, BP and the Obama White House announced a novel agreement under which BP created a new $20 billion oil-spill fund to pay individuals and businesses suffering losses arising out of the disaster. Kenneth R. Feinberg moved from his post as "pay czar" for financial institutions receiving federal assistance in order to undertake administration of this Gulf Coast Claims Facility (the Facility). Feinberg is the same Washington-based lawyer who ran the victims' compensation fund after Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Drill Baby . . . Spill Baby: How the Oil Pollution Act's Economic-Damage Liability Cap Contributed to the Deepwater Horizon Disaster

On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded off the coast of Louisiana. The explosion and subsequent fire killed 11 workers and injured several others, and started the release of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from more than one mile beneath the surface of the water. It is still too early to tell, but it may very well be the biggest environmental disaster in the history of the United States. Was it foreseeable? Was it preventable?