EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling parties to pay $5,000 in U.S. response costs incurred at the Colville Post & Poles, Inc. Superfund site near Colville, Washington, to pay all proceeds from the sale of the property, and to execute an environmental covenant to impose restrictions on the use of the property.

EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA for reimbursement of past U.S. response costs concerning the Biological Processors of Alabama Superfund site in Decatur, Alabama.

EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $185,734 in U.S. response costs incurred at the San Fernando Valley Area 1 Superfund site near Los Angeles, California. 

United States v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-00701-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 2011). Settling CERCLA defendants responsible for violations at the Stauffer Chemical Company Cold Creek Superfund site and the LeMoyne Plants Superfund site in Mobile County, Alabama, must pay $912,913.27 in U.S. response costs incurred at the sites, must pay future response costs at one operable unit, and must undertake remedial work at the sites.

United States v. Coeur d'Alenes Co., No. 11-CV-00633-EJL (D. Idaho Dec. 15, 2011). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the Conjecture Mine Superfund site in Bonner County, Idaho, must pay $350,000 in U.S. response costs incurred at the site. 

United States v. Allied Waste of Puerto Rico, Inc., No. 3:11-cv-2218 (D.P.R. Dec. 16, 2011). Settling CERCLA defendants responsible for violations at the Vega Baja Solid Waste Disposal Superfund site in Rio Abajo Ward, Puerto Rico, must pay $1.5 million in U.S. response costs incurred at the site, must implement remedial action to address lead contamination, must aid in the development of institutional controls and operation and maintenance provisions, and must pay EPA's future oversight costs. 

United States v. Intel Corp., No. 91-CV-20275 JW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2011). Under an amended consent decree, settling defendants responsible for violations at the Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman Superfund site in Mountain View, California, must implement a vapor intrusion remedy to address exposure to contaminants at the site. 

United States v. AK Steel Corp., No. 97-1863 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2011). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the Breslube Penn Superfund site in Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, must pay $535,000 in U.S. response costs incurred at the site.

EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling parties to pay $102,161 in U.S. response costs incurred at the San Fernando Valley Area 1 Superfund site near Los Angeles, California.

EPA entered into a proposed administrative cost recovery settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $237,878.07 in U.S. response costs incurred at the Abbott Mine/Turkey Run Mine Superfund site in Lake County, California.