H.R. 2298
would ensure that certain broadband projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews.
would ensure that certain broadband projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews.
would amend the Internal Revenue Code to establish special rules for capital gains invested in brownfield and superfund sites.
would provide that an eligible facilities request under §6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 is not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews.
would reauthorize the National Landslide Preparedness Act.
would require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere to conduct a project to improve forecasts of coastal marine fog.
would amend the Internal Revenue Code to promote the increased use of renewable natural gas, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other harmful transportation-related emissions that contribute to poor air quality, and increase job creation and economic opportunity throughout the United States.
would amend the Internal Revenue Code to support upgrades at existing hydroelectric dams in order to increase clean energy production, improve the resiliency and reliability of the U.S. electric grid, and enhance the health of the nation's rivers and associated wildlife habitats.
would establish a contracting preference for public buildings that use innovative wood products in the construction of those buildings.
This Article examines the intersection of environmental crises and financial disclosure obligations through the lens of Great Salt Lake. As the lake shrinks to unprecedented levels, the resulting dust storms, diminished snowpack, and destabilized ecosystems increasingly threaten both the public health and economic viability of Utah’s most populous region, and economic impacts will extend far beyond industries directly dependent on the lake. These environmental threats can translate into material financial risks for publicly traded companies and municipal bond issuers, potentially necessitating disclosure under existing securities law. While industries directly reliant on the lake’s ecosystem may already face disclosure obligations, these will expand to include more sectors and geographic areas if the lake is allowed to continue to shrink. The Article argues that recognizing these growing securities liabilities presents a powerful additional reason for urgent policy interventions to restore the lake and safeguard the region’s long-term economic viability. This case study shows how localized environmental crises generate systemic vulnerabilities across economic sectors, with implications for similar situations worldwide.
This Comment focuses on energy developments offshore. Part I recognizes OCSLA’s purpose of balancing energy needs with protection of marine animals, coastal beaches, and wetlands. Part II discusses examples of presidential use of OCSLA §12(a) authority to protect (withdraw from leasing) portions of the OCS temporarily or permanently, including challenges to President Biden’s recent withdrawal of the East Coast, West Coast, and part of the Gulf of Mexico and Bering Strait from future oil and gas leases. Part III explores limitations on OCSLA §12(a) presidential authority to rescind or modify prior presidents’ withdrawals. Part IV details the need to protect marine mammals from impacts associated with oil and gas exploration, including seismic air gun blasting and sonar that significantly impairs hearing, communication, balance, feeding, and breeding. Part V examines the potential impact of President Trump’s wind moratorium. Part VI provides context for President Trump’s pro-energy/anti-environmental initiatives, and Part VII concludes.
You are not logged in. To access this content: