Climate Change (generally)
H.R. 10360
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Armed Services
Sponsor Name
Escobar
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Tex.
Issue
2
Volume
55
Update Issue
35
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H7110

would require the Secretary of Defense to enhance the readiness of DOD to challenges relating to climate change and to improve the energy and resource efficiency of the Department.

S. 5385
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Sponsor Name
Lankford
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Okla.
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
34
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. S6723

would prohibit federal agencies from considering, in taking any action, the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, the social cost of nitrous oxide, or the social cost of any other greenhouse gas, unless compliant with OMB guidance. 

A National Security Threat Without Borders: Climate Change and the Need for Military Facility Modernization
Author
Janessa H. Brito
Author Bios (long)

Major Janessa H. Brito is a 2024 LL.M. graduate of the George Washington University Law School and a judge advocate general in the U.S. Air Force.

Date
December 2024
Volume
54
Issue
12
Page
11035
Type
Articles
Summary

The U.S. military has recognized climate change as a national security threat. Over the past three decades, installations across the country have experienced infrastructure damage, personnel evacuations, and millions or billions in rebuilding or repair costs. This Article argues that most military facilities are woefully unprepared for these impacts; to expedite action, it calls for a focus on expanding Other Transaction Authority (OTA) for infrastructure-related procurement, as well as specific measures, mandates, and responses. The Article examines recent devastating weather events across Air Force installations in Florida and California. It then discusses recent laws on environmental response, with a focus on the National Defense Authorization Acts and specific provisions for infrastructure, facility, and related environmental measures, and highlights various directives, plans, and spending behavior. It concludes by proposing top-down solutions for speeding procurement and broadening use of OTAs.

H.R. 10174
Update Type
Committee Name
Committees on Science, Space, and Technology and Transportation and Infrastructure
Sponsor Name
Barragan
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Cal.
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
33
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H6154

would direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to support the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of zero emission vessels and retrofit or replacement of existing vessels with zero emission technologies and charging or fueling infrastructure.

H.R. 10120
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Financial Services
Sponsor Name
Balderson
Sponsor Party Affiliation
R-Ohio
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
33
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H6012

would nullify certain interagency guidance related to climate-related financial risk management for large financial institutions.

H.R. 10117
Update Type
Committee Name
Committees on Foreign Affairs the Judiciary, Financial Services, Oversight and Accountability, and Ways and Means
Sponsor Name
Escobar
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Tex.
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
32
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H5975

would authorize the imposition of sanctions with respect to significant actions that exacerbate climate change and reinforce comprehensive efforts to limit global average temperature rise.

S. 5306
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Sponsor Name
Markey
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Mass.
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
32
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. S6563

would authorize the imposition of sanctions with respect to significant actions that exacerbate climate change and reinforce comprehensive efforts to limit global average temperature rise.

H. Res. 1563
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on Energy and Commerce and Committee on Foreign Affairs
Sponsor Name
Thompson
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Cal.
Issue
1
Volume
55
Update Issue
31
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H5912

would express the sense of Congress that the United States is committed to ensuring a safe and healthy climate for future generations, and thus to restoring the climate.

H.R. 10074
Update Type
Committee Name
Committee on House Administration
Sponsor Name
Neguse
Sponsor Party Affiliation
D-Colo.
Issue
12
Volume
54
Update Issue
31
Update Volume
54
Congress Number
118
Congressional Record Number
170 Cong. Rec. H5900

would direct the U.S. Comptroller General, in coordination with the National Academy of Sciences, to study alternatives for a nonpartisan congressional office or agency to project the net greenhouse gas emissions likely to be caused by federal legislation.

Failure-to-Adapt Climate Litigation at 20: An Underused Tool?
Author
Dov Waisman
Author Bios (long)

Dov Waisman is a Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School.

Date
November 2024
Volume
54
Issue
11
Page
10960
Type
Articles
Summary

As the prospects of significantly mitigating climate change through emissions reductions become dimmer, the critical necessity of adaptation has become clearer, with failure-to-adapt litigation possibly playing an important role in bringing adaptation measures to pass. Based on a review of every adaptation-related case in the U.S. Climate Litigation Database maintained by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, this Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of failure-to-adapt litigation in the United States. It finds that such cases have proliferated in this country over the past decade, but that the lawsuits so far filed have sought specific, incremental, and relatively small-scale adaptation measures rather than systemic, large-scale, coordinated action. The Article’s central finding is that failure-to-adapt litigation in the United States has so far been only modestly successful: most suits have failed, but a significant minority have succeeded. Failure-to-adapt litigation succeeds frequently enough to make it an important, and perhaps underutilized, tool for bringing about much-needed adaptive measures in the United States.

You must be an ELI Member to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: