H.R. 4774
would direct the FEMA Administrator to issue guidance on extreme temperature events and resilience goals.
would direct the FEMA Administrator to issue guidance on extreme temperature events and resilience goals.
would require the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct research relating to measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration.
This Article, adapted from the Climate Science and Law for Judges Curriculum, examines the status and viability of judicial remedies in climate change litigation. It focuses on climate cases that are seeking science-based remedies specifically related to climate mitigation (actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or draw down atmospheric carbon) and climate-change adaptation (actions to reduce the negative impacts of climate disruption on human and natural communities). A wide variety of remedies are explored, including injunctive relief, writ of mandamus, declaratory relief, remand, vacatur, damages, civil penalties, accounting, and award of costs and attorney fees. The Article focuses on U.S. cases, both federal and state, with some reference to key decisions rendered in other countries for comparative purposes.
In June 2022, in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that on “major questions” the U.S. Congress must legislate with far more clarity and specificity than previously demanded. The Court held the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may regulate power plant carbon emissions in traditional ways, but the novel approach taken in the Clean Power Plan required clearer authorization than Congress had provided. Six weeks later, Congress enacted the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Designed in anticipation of the Court’s new demands, the IRA amends the Clean Air Act to provide a clear and contemporary statement that greenhouse gases are air pollutants and to direct EPA to issue new standards; and it provides large financial incentives to defray the cost of new regulations for power companies and their customers. In May 2023, EPA proposed new standards informed by both West Virginia and the IRA. This Article surveys the evolution of judicial review standards leading up to West Virginia and critically analyzes that decision; explains how the IRA rejuvenates the regulatory path for EPA to act on climate change; and reviews EPA’s new proposed carbon pollution standards for power plants.
would clarify the inability of the president to declare national emergencies under the National Emergencies Act, major disasters or emergencies under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and public health emergencies under the Public Health Service Act on the premise of climate change.
would direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish a grant program to assist primarily low-income individuals in making their homes and property more resilient to the impacts of climate change.
would promote long-term economic recovery and job creation in environmental justice communities by providing for investment in catalytic local predevelopment projects for resilient climate infrastructure innovation, and provide assistance to support state and local project development.
would clarify the inability of the president to declare national emergencies under the National Emergencies Act, major disasters or emergencies under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and public health emergencies under the Public Health Service Act on the premise of climate change.
would authorize appropriations for climate financing.
You are not logged in. To access this content: