76 FR 33181
SIP Proposal: California (VOC emissions for the San Joaquin Valley unified air pollution control district).
Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.
76 FR 32113
SIP Proposal: California (volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions for the San Joaquin Valley unified air pollution control district and the Imperial County air pollution control district).
76 FR 58954
FWS determined endangered status under the ESA for Casey's June beetle and designated approximately 587 acres in Riverside County, California, as critical habitat for the species.
76 FR 58868
FWS and the NMFS determined that four species of loggerhead sea turtles should be listed as threatened and that five species should be listed as endangered under the ESA.
76 FR 58748
SIP Proposal: Texas (partial approval of 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS, 1997 and 2006 fine PM NAAQS, and interstate transport of pollution revisions).
76 FR 58808
EPA entered into a proposed partial consent decree under the CAA in Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 1:10-cv-1541 (D.D.C.), that establishes deadlines for the Agency to promulgate a federal implementation plan (FIP) for the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM) and eight-hour ozone NAAQS for Texas and to take final action on the its SIP.
Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera
A California appellate court affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court decision granting an environmental group's petition for writ of mandamus challenging a county's approval of a mixed-use development project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The lower court corr...
Ross v. California Coastal Commission
A California appellate court held that the California Coastal Commission complied with the California Coastal Act and the California Environmental Quality Act when it certified a coastal development project along beachfront dune property in the city of Malibu. Petitioners argued that the commiss...
Assateague Coastkeepers v. Maryland Department of the Environment
A Maryland appellate court held that the state's general discharge permit for animal feeding operations complies with the CWA and state law. The general permit authorizes certain discharges but imposes requirements regarding the management of manure and its application as fertilizer. Environment...
AES Corp. v. Steadfast Insurance Co.
A Virginia appellate court held that under Virginia law, an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify an energy company in an underlying lawsuit brought by a native Alaskan village for damages allegedly caused by global warming through the emission of greenhouse gases. The relevant policies onl...