Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Crowe v. Coleman

The court holds that plaintiff-appellant landowners' allegation that gasoline contamination from an adjoining property constituted a continuing nuisance presents an arguable cause of action under state law against the current adjacent landowner. The court first holds that plaintiff-appellants' plead...

United States v. Michigan

The court holds that a Michigan confined disposal facility (CDF) run by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) must accept dredged materials that were accumulated to determine the environmental impacts that the construction of a combined sewer overflow (CSO) retention basin will have on a cree...

Cermak v. Babbitt

The court holds that a district court properly transferred to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims a case involving the issuance of two Indian Land Certificates. In 1944, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) issued an individual two parcels of land. Upon the death of the individual in 1989, DOI can...

Hirt v. Richardson

The court holds that individuals' National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) suit against the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeking to enjoin the agency from shipping the nuclear material mixed oxide uranium (MOx), from the United States and Russia to Canada is moot. The individuals claimed that DOE...

Baker v. Exxon Corp.

The court holds that seafood processors who settled with an oil company in connection with the Exxon Valdez oil spill before the mandatory punitive damages class was certified are entitled to share in the allocation of a punitive damages judgment even though the settling processors assigned their fu...

Sac & Fox Nation of Mo. v. Norton

The court holds that the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) had a non-discretionary duty to take into trust land purchased by the Wyandotte Tribe in Kansas, and, therefore, no National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and no National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) analysis was necessary before a...

Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v. New York, City of

The court holds that New York City must obtain state legislative approval before it can build a water filtration plant at a city park. Legislative approval is required when there is a substantial intrusion on parkland for non-park purposes, regardless of whether there has been an outright conveyance...

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Nebraska

The court affirms in part and reverses in part a district court decision holding that certain beneficiaries to the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact (the Compact) had a right to sue Nebraska for acts delaying the construction of the Compact's disposal facility and that the state...

California Power Exch. Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm'n

The court denies a California public utility's petition for a writ of mandamus staying various aspects of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) order addressing the crisis surrounding California's restructuring of its electricity market, and denies a city's petition for mandamus ordering FER...

Friends of Sierra Madre v. Sierra Madre, City of

The court holds that initiative measures generated and placed on the ballot by a public agency are not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The city of Sierra Madre enacted a historic preservation ordinance, and several owners of landmarked property claimed that their propert...