Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Andrews v. Amherst, Town of

A court upheld a town's right to regulate development through zoning that prevents development in flood plains. Landowners filed suit against the town after their property was rezoned from a light industrial zone to a flood-prone conservancy zone. A state land court ruled that the town's action was ...

Feduniak v. California Coastal Comm'n

A California appellate court held that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not bar the California Coastal Commission from ordering homeowners to remove a private three-hole golf course from around their house and to restore the area to its native sand dune vegetation. The property was burdened b...

Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. Alameda, City of

A California court upheld the dismissal of a petition under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) challenging a city's approval of a redevelopment project involving both the rehabilitation of a historic theater and the construction of an adjacent multi-screen cineplex and parking structure...

Nilsson v. Department of Envtl. Protection of N.Y.

New York's highest court ordered the modification of a lower court decision reversing a local agency's denial of a landowner's request for a variance to build an underground sewage treatment system within the New York City watershed. The agency denied the variance application because the landowner f...

Rockstead v. Crystal Lake, City of

The Seventh Circuit upheld the dismissal of landowners' takings claim against a city for allowing their land to become flooded due to city-owned stormwater detention ponds and a wastewater treatment facility. The flooding transformed their land from farmland to wetlands. The landowners filed an inve...

San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Ctr. v. Merced, County of

A California appellate court held that a county board's certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) and approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) regarding a proposed expansion of a mining operation violated the California Environmental Quality Act. The EIR was inadequate in several respe...

Woodward Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Fresno, City of

A California appellate court held that a city violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in approving new commercial development on vacant land. One of the CEQA's two major purposes is to require public agencies to adopt feasible mitigation measures to lessen the environmental impacts ...

Amador, County of v. Plymouth, City of

A California appellate court upheld the invalidation of a municipal services agreement between a Native American tribe and a city concerning the tribe's plan to build a gaming facility on land it has the option to purchase. The tribe applied to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior to take the land in ...

Florence v. Crescent Resources, Ltd. Liab. Co.

The Eleventh Circuit held that a district court should have remanded to state court individuals' strict liability claims against a development company for groundwater and surface water contamination. The individuals initially filed their claims in Florida court, but the defendants removed the case t...

Lombardi v. Whitman

The Second Circuit upheld the dismissal of rescue, search, and cleanup workers' substantive due process complaint against federal officials for knowingly issuing false statements about air quality safety in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks of the World Trade Center. The wor...