Search Results
Use the filters on the left-hand side of this screen to refine the results further by topic or document type.

Louisiana Shrimp Ass'n v. Biden

A district court denied a shrimping advocacy group's motion for summary judgment in a challenge to NMFS' 2019 rule requiring turtle excluder devices on skimmer trawl vessels greater than 40 feet in length operating in inshore waters. The group argued the agency failed to justify revoking the pr...

Hoffman v. United States Department of Treasury

A district court dismissed a lawsuit brought by Kansas landowners and the city of Rossville challenging construction of a nearby large-scale industrial solar power project. The plaintiffs argued tax credits provided under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) incentivized the project, and sought to...

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

A district court denied summary judgment for environmental groups in a challenge to the Bureau of Reclamation's application of provisions of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act governing certain kinds of contracts for water delivery from the federal Central Valley Project...

Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

A district court granted in part environmental groups' motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit concerning their 2017 petition to FWS to revise the critical habitat for the endangered Mount Graham red squirrel. The groups argued FWS' delay in resolving their petition was "unreasonable" in violation ...

United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries Service

A district court dismissed a lawsuit brought by a fishing group challenging NMFS' adoption of an amendment to a fisheries management plan (FMP) for salmon fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the coast of Alaska. The group argued the amendment violated the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) be...

Idaho Conservation League v. Bonneville Power Administration

The Ninth Circuit denied environmental groups' challenge to the Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA's) decision to spend only 10% of its excess financial reserves on measures to protect fish and wildlife. The groups argued BPA violated its obligations under §4(h)(11)(A) of the Pacific Northwest ...