77 FR 38629
EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $50,000 in response costs in connection with the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund site in Osceola, Arkansas.
EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $50,000 in response costs in connection with the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund site in Osceola, Arkansas.
EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $12,727.17 in response costs in connection with the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund site in Osceola, Arkansas.
EPA entered into a proposed administrative settlement under CERCLA that requires the settling party to pay $2,500,000 in response costs in connection with the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund site in Osceola, Arkansas.
EPA proposed to approve revisions to Louisiana's hazardous waste management program.
EPA approved revisions to Louisiana's hazardous waste management program.
United States v. Stearns Co., Ltd., No. 12-cv-191-JMH (E.D. Ky.). Settling CERCLA defendants responsible for past and future response costs incurred by the U.S. Forest Service at the Lower Rock Creek Mines Superfund site in McCreary County, Kentucky, must agree to the entry of a judgment in favor of the United States in the amount of $31.8 million, which can be accomplished through the transfer of real property interests and recoveries from insurance policies.
EPA, after further evaluation, proposed to grant a petition to exclude (or delist) from the lists of hazardous wastes the underflow water generated by ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company in Baytown, Texas.
United States v. INEOS USA LLC, No. 3:12-cv-01404 (N.D. Ohio June 4, 2012). A settling CAA, CERCLA, and EPCRA defendant responsible for violations at its chemical manufacturing plant in Lima, Ohio, must pay a $1,150,000 civil penalty; must implement an enhanced leak detection and repair program; must improve training, reporting and recordkeeping; must undertake an analysis of the releases; must review and update training; and must perform a CERCLA/EPCRA audit.
United States v. Allied Signal Inc., No. 1513 (RPP) (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 2012). A settling CERCLA defendant responsible for violations at the Cortese Landfill Superfund site in Tusten, New York, must perform additional response action to address newly identified source-area contamination at the site.
United States v. Jacob Goldberg & Son, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 3237 (S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2012). Under two proposed consent decrees, settling CERCLA defendants responsible for violations at the Port Refinery Superfund site in Rye Brook, New York, must pay $245,000 in U.S. response costs incurred at the site.