United States v. Spaulding Composites Co.

ELR Citation: ELR 20654
No(s). 94-5451 (DMC) (D.N.J. May 10, 2002)

The court holds that a company failed to meet its burden of proving the divisibility of response costs at a New Jersey Superfund site and, thus, is responsible for all of the response costs associated with one phase of remediation at the site. The company argued that the response costs are divisible...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: