ELR Citation: ELR 20796
No(s). 83-2145 (5th Cir. Sep 17, 1984)

The court holds that it erred in using the arbitrary and capricious standard of review to evaluate the discussion of alternatives in an environmental impact statement (EIS). The court denies a petition for rehearing en banc, but corrects its earlier statement of the standard of review. The use of th...