Superfund and the Eleventh Amendment: Are the States Immune From §307 Suits?

April 1984
Citation:
14
ELR 10156
Issue
4
Author
Frank M. Thomas Jr.

By the literal terms of §107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA),1 the states may be held strictly liable for costs incurred by private parties in responding to hazardous pollution incidents traceable to state-owned facilities. In United States v. Union Gas Co.,2 however, a federal district court recently held that private-party liability suits against the states are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. If other courts follow Union Gas, the states will be immune from cost recovery actions even though the states are "potentially responsible parties" at some of the nation's most notorious hazardous waste disposal sites.3 Congress did not intend such a result, and an analysis of CERCLA shows that Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity should not be a defense to a §107 suit.

Mr. Thomas is an attorney with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in Philadelphia. Between 1980 and 1983, he served as Divisional Deputy City Solicitor (Special Projects) for the city of Philadelphia. He has published articles in the Environmental Law Reporter, the Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, and the Journal American Water Works Association.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Superfund and the Eleventh Amendment: Are the States Immune From §307 Suits?

SKU: article-25498 Price: $50.00