Regulation, Governance, and Nanotechnology: Is a Framework Convention for Nanotechnology the Way to Go? Comment on A Framework Convention for Nanotechnology?

August 2008
Citation:
38
ELR 10515
Issue
8
Author
Lynn L. Bergeson

An international framework convention protocol approach for nanotechnology is an intriguing notion and one that would appear to make good sense. This Comment on Profs. Kenneth Abbott, Gary Marchant, and Douglas Sylvester's proposal, as set forth in their excellent article entitled A Framework Convention for Nanotechnology?, is offered more to spark further thought than as a response to the question they pose. As discussed more below, given the inherent appeal of the proposal, the real question may be not whether, but when a framework convention approach should be pursued in earnest, and how best to initiate the process to ensure its success.

Lynn L. Bergeson is Managing Director of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C., law firm focusing on conventional and engineered nanoscale chemical, pesticide, and other specialty chemical product approval and regulation, environmental health and safety law, chemical product litigation, and associated business issues, and President of The Acta Group, L.L.C., and The Acta Group EU, Ltd., with offices in Washington, D.C., and Manchester, United Kingdom. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Dr. Shaun F. Clancy, Evonik Industries, who indulged the author's request for his valuable views on this Comment.
Article File