Putting the Ban Back Together: A Critical Look at California Restaurant Association v. Berkeley

April 2024
Citation:
54
ELR 10325
Issue
4
Author
Chris Whittaker

Concerned by methane’s potent climate-altering emissions, a growing number of states and municipalities have embraced the phaseout of natural gas as a tool to mitigate climate change. But in April 2023, the California Restaurant Association successfully petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to overturn the city of Berkeley’s ban on natural gas infrastructure in new buildings. The three-judge panel found the ban preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act, and in January 2024, the Ninth Circuit denied Berkeley’s petition for rehearing. Armed with a successful legal claim, industry is primed to challenge other state and local gas prohibitions. This Article weighs the panel’s reasoning in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s text-based jurisprudence and argues the decision may prove to be a flash in the pan.

Chris Whittaker is a 2025 J.D. candidate at Fordham University School of Law.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Putting the Ban Back Together: A Critical Look at California Restaurant Association v. Berkeley

SKU: article-54-ELR-10325 Price: $50.00