Is Meat the New Tobacco? Regulating Food Demand in the Age of Climate Change

April 2019
Citation:
49
ELR 10344
Issue
4
Author
Lingxi Chenyang

Switching from a meat-heavy to a plant-based diet is one of the highest-impact lifestyle changes for climate mitigation and adaptation. However, conventional demand-side energy policy has focused on increasing consumption of efficient machines and fuels. Regulating food demand has key advantages. First, food consumption is biologically constrained, thus switching to more efficient foods avoids unintended consequences of switching to more efficient machines, like higher overall energy consumption. Second, food consumption, like smoking, is primed for normshifting because it occurs in socially conspicuous environments. Indeed, while place-based bans and information regulation were essential in lowering the prevalence of smoking, the same strategies may be even more effective in reducing meat demand. Several policy reforms can be implemented at the federal level, from reform of food marketing schemes to publicly subsidized meal programs.

Lingxi Chenyang is a J.D. candidate at Yale Law School and Ph.D. candidate in Philosophy at the University of Michigan.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

Is Meat the New Tobacco? Regulating Food Demand in the Age of Climate Change

SKU: article-288214 Price: $50.00