The Legal Case Against Lender Liability

May 1991
Citation:
21
ELR 10243
Issue
5
Author
John P.C. Fogarty

Are lenders' fears of Superfund liability justified? The conventional wisdom holds that they are. However, this hasty judgment may not be able to withstand legal scrutiny.

Substantial protection from liability for lenders is already provided by §101(20)(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).1 This section excludes from the definition of "owner or operator" a person whose indicia of ownership in a facility are held to protect a security interest, provided that the security holder refrains from "participating in the management" of the facility. The focus of the lender liability debate concerns the types of activities that are considered evidence of "management participation" that would potentially subject a lender to CERCLA liability.

John P.C. Fogarty, an attorney in Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Enforcement, is the Chair of the Agency's Lender Liability Rule Workgroup. The opinions expressed in this Dialogue are solely those of Mr. Fogarty, and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. EPA.

You must be an ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter subscriber to download the full article.

You are not logged in. To access this content:

The Legal Case Against Lender Liability

SKU: article-25826 Price: $50.00