CWA In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Project and Programmatic Risks

June 2019
Citation:
49
ELR 10538
Issue
6
Author
Royal C. Gardner, Erin Okuno, Rebecca Kihslinger, and Christina Libre

In 2008, after prompting by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) issued a regulation governing compensatory mitigation under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The agencies’ primary goal was to improve the effectiveness of mitigation projects to offset the impacts of filling wetlands and streams. The 2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule was also designed to level the playing field for the three types of mitigation providers: mitigation banks, in-lieu fee (ILF) programs, and permittee-responsible mitigation. After a decade of experience with this regulation, it is appropriate to reflect on its implementation. Although much has been written about mitigation banks, less attention (in the literature at least) has been paid to ILF programs and permittee-responsible mitigation.5 This Comment focuses on ILF programs.

Royal C. Gardner is a Professor of Law and Director of the Institute for Biodiversity Law and Policy at Stetson University College of Law. Erin Okuno is the Foreman Biodiversity Fellow and an Adjunct Professor of Law at Stetson University College of Law. Rebecca Kihslinger is the Senior Science and Policy Analyst and Director of the Wetlands Program at the Environmental Law Institute. Christina Libre is a Research Associate with the Environmental Law Institute.

Article File