The 1973 Japanese Law for the Compensation of Pollution-Related Health Damage: An Introductory Assessment
In 1972, the United Nations Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment highlighted for all the world the significance of foreign practice and experience in the search for more effective environmental management at home. Less well-publicized is the mandate that the Conference imposed on the legal profession: to look through a foreign culture to the essence of its response, to translate it and, ultimately, to render it usable abroad. In this sense, the Conference curiously was ahead of its time, since it asked of the legal profession a task that lawyers have been ill-equipped by training or proclivity to perform.
A central barrier for the American environmental lawyer venturing into this field is that a foreign approach, devised for the exigencies of another setting, may offend basic values and sensibilities. The establishment of a system of compensation to victims of pollution in Japan, for example, may outrage some American public interest lawyers uncompromisingly committed to preventative litigation. Nevertheless, patient study of alternative approaches can be rewarded by insights valuable to ourselves, and also, one hopes, to other countries. This is the challenge of the Japanese Law for the Compensation of Pollution-Related Health Damage enacted in 1973.1