![close up](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_item_338x252/public/4doaks.jpg?itok=BZBBrjsO)
A district court adopted a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations to remand to state court a climate liability lawsuit brought by an Oregon county against oil and gas companies.
![Fern Hawaii](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_item_338x252/public/fern_hawaii.jpg?itok=nB81D6au)
The Ninth Circuit reversed in part summary judgment for the operators of a marine cargo terminal on Puget Sound in a CWA citizen suit concerning stormwater discharges.
![lily](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_item_338x252/public/lily_bw.jpg?itok=VYFFBUMB)
The July issue of ELR features articles on net metering of rooftop solar; strengthening Superfund cleanups with land use institutional controls; and natural resource damages under CERCLA and OPA. The issue also includes a transcript from a recent webinar that discussed EPA's new particulate matter standard and how it will affect various environmental sectors.
![kakadu](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_item_338x252/public/kakadu.jpg?itok=B_eFcpgN)
Supplemental environmental projects (SEPs) have received a growing amount of attention in recent years, from the Donald Trump Administration banning their use in settlements, to regulation and guidance from the Joseph Biden Administration reversing the ban, to legislative proposals prohibiting them altogether. This Article examines SEPs’ legality under existing law, focusing on claims that they violate the Miscellaneous Receipts Act and the Antideficiency Act.