Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Claim held insufficient

MacKenzie v. San Marcos, City of

A district court dismissed property owners' takings, substantive due process, and equal protection claims against a city after the city denied the owners' request for building permits. The owners' takings claim was dismissed for lack of...

Kantner v. Martin County

The court holds that a county's imposition of conditions on commercial developers' master plan for three parcels of property did not violate the developers' rights to substantive due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth...

Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Comm'rs of Jay County

The court holds that a county ordinance that imposed a moratorium on landfills did not exact a taking from a landowner or violate the landowner's substantive and procedural due process rights. The court invalidated the ordinance in a...

Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. Bongartz

The court holds that a residential land developer's regulatory taking and due process claims are not ripe in the developer's appeal of the Vermont Environmental Board's (Board's) denial of the developer's application to build a...