Mraz v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co.

ELR Citation: ELR 20372
No(s). 85-2399 (4th Cir. Nov 4, 1986)

The court holds that an insurance company does not have a duty to defend the insureds, who are defendants in a cost recovery action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), because there was no occurrence during the insurance policy period, there was ...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: