Goeb v. Tharaldson

ELR Citation: ELR 20101
No(s). CX-98-2275 (Minn. Aug 17, 2000)

The court holds that the standard for admissibility of novel scientific evidence set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), and State v. Mack, 292 N.W.2d 764 (Minn. 1980), rather than the standard set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 23 ELR ...

You must be an ELR subscriber to access the full content.

You are not logged in. To access this content: