Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Pollution exclusion clause

Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co. v. General Dynamics Corp.

The court holds that a district court erred when it interpreted pollution exclusion clauses in comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance policies as not relieving an insurer of its duty to defend and reimburse an insured for its...

Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co.

The court, in a case of first impression under Utah law, holds that the "sudden and accidental" phrase in a comprehensive general liability policy pollution exclusion clause means abrupt or quick and unexpected or unintentional. An...

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Triangle Indus., Inc.

The court, applying New Jersey law, holds that comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance policies containing original and modified pollution exclusion provisions do not provide an insured manufacturer of cable and wire with...

Broderick Inv. Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

The court holds that under Colorado law, the pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability insurance policy bars coverage for environmental response costs sought by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in...

Intel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

The court holds that a computer circuit manufacturer is entitled to reimbursement under its comprehensive general liability insurance policy of expenses incurred pursuant to a government consent decree requiring it to clean up toxic...

Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co.

The court holds that two insurance companies have no duty to defend or indemnify a company that served as the intermediary for the disposal of dioxin-contaminated waste against personal injury and property damage claims allegedly...

G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Royal Group, Inc.

The court, on reargument of summary judgment motions necessitated by intervening Michigan Supreme Court decisions, holds that insurers of a beer manufacturer are not required to provide the manufacturer with coverage under its...

New Castle County v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

The court holds that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability insurance policy does not bar an insured county's right to indemnification of amounts that it must pay in lawsuits resulting from pollution from a...

Gerrish Corp. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

The court holds that an insurance policy, as amended by the insurer's agent to negate the policy's pollution exclusions, provides coverage of state claims for environmental cleanup costs. Although the original policy language excluded...

Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. Belleville Indus.

The court holds that the "sudden and accidental" exception to the pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability insurance policy does not require an insurer to provide coverage of an insured manufacturing company's...

  • «
  • ...
  • 6  |  
  • 7  |  
  • 8  |  
  • 9  |  
  • 10