Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Judicial review

Ecology Ctr. v. Gorman

The court holds that for purposes of allowing additional limited discovery to supplement the administrative record, an action challenging the U.S. Forest Service's decision to renew a grazing permit in the Little Badger Allotment of the...

Alameda Water & Sanitation Dist. v. Environmental Defense Fund

The court holds that environmental groups may not intervene in a district court's review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's or the Agency's) veto of a dredge and fill permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers...

National Audubon Soc'y v. U.S. Forest Serv.

The court reverses a district court's decision denying a U.S. Forest Service motion for summary judgment that it did not violate the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS)...

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Bd.

The court holds that a regulation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) providing that the Board may close meetings, or portions of meetings, involving deliberations on its recommendations relating to the public health...

Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, Village of v. Marsh

The court holds en banc that the arbitrary and capricious standard of review applies to agency decisions not to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act. The court overrules its prior...

  • «
  • 1  |  
  • 2  |  
  • 3  |  
  • 4  |  
  • 5