Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Judgment satisfied, FRCP 60(b)(5)

United States v. Kayser-Roth Corp.

The court holds that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51, 28 ELR 21225 (1998), does not render the prospective application of a 1990...

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Flanders Elec. Motor Serv., Inc.

The court holds that a company that is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act is not entitled to relief from a final judgment that conflicts with a later state...

Northern Alaska Envtl. Ctr. v. Lujan

The court holds that the district court, in applying the rule of reason, did not abuse its discretion in dissolving an injunction when it held that the environmental impact statements (EISs) produced by the National Park Service (NPS),...