Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

No. 90-1230 (985 F.2d 1075) (D.C. Cir. January 11, 1993)

The court denies various postruling motions, including a motion for clarification, and clarifies its previous opinion.

[A related decision is published at 23 ELR 20024.]

Counsel for Petitioner
Michael Steinberg
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
1800 M St. NW, Ste. 800, Washington DC 20036
(202) 467-7000

Counsel for Respondent
Mary E. Ward
Environment and Natural Resources Division
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington DC 20530
(202) 514-2000

Before: EDWARDS, BUCKLEY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

[24 ELR 20159]

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing, the motion of the Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition for leave to file opposition as amicus curiae, petitioners' motion for clarification, the responses thereto and of the reply, it is

Ordered, by the Court, that the motion for leave to file as amicus curiae is denied. It is

Further Ordered, by the Court, that the petition for rehearing is denied. The RCRA treatment standards were vacated only insofar as expressly indicated in the September 25, 1992 panel opinion. It is

Further Ordered, by the Court, that the motion for clarification is denied.