Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Murr v. Wisconsin

ELR Citation: ELR 20082
Nos. 15–214, (U.S., 06/23/2017) (Kennedy, J.)

The Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, decided that the owners of a family cottage were not entitled to compensation over development regulations that bar the sale of the family's adjacent lot. The family wanted to sell the lot to finance an upgrade to their cottage, and argued that St....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: