Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

State v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Citation: 40 ELR 20189
No. No. 08-6385, (D. Minn., 07/14/2010)

A district court held that a property owner's Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA) claims against a former owner are not time barred even though the state agency issued a "decision document" describing the former owner's cleanup of the site as "final" well beyond the statute of limitations period....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: