Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Tacoma Promenade v. Tacoma, City of

ELR Citation: ELR 20026
Nos. No. 01-35143, 45 F. Appx. 620/(9th Cir., 08/20/2002)

The court affirms a district court holding that a city did not breach a contract with a developer by failing to obtain the wetlands permits necessary for the development of an apartment complex and shopping center. The court first holds that nothing in the contract obligated the city to obtain the wetlands permits....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: