Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Martin v. Shell Oil Co.

ELR Citation: ELR 20440
Nos. No. 3-99-CV-1428 (JCH), 198 F.R.D. 580/(D. Conn., 01/10/2002)

The court holds that expert testimony offered by two Connecticut individuals suing an oil company for damages caused by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) contamination is admissible and that all but two of the individuals' causes of action against the company survive summary judgment. Two experts testified on behalf of the individuals....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: