Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

United States v. Kramer

ELR Citation: ELR 20856
Nos. Nos. 89-4340 (JBS), -4380 (JBS), 913 F. Supp. 848/(D.N.J., 10/31/1995) determination of law of the case on defenses

The court holds that the unreasonableness, excessiveness, duplicativeness, impropriety, and non-cost-effectiveness of response costs are not defenses to a cost recovery action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) if defendants fail to prove that such costs are inconsistent with the national con...

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: