Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Texas Comm. on Natural Resources v. Marsh

ELR Citation: ELR 20796
Nos. No. 83-2145, 741 F.2d 1823/(5th Cir., 09/17/1984) Reh'g denied

The court holds that it erred in using the arbitrary and capricious standard of review to evaluate the discussion of alternatives in an environmental impact statement (EIS). The court denies a petition for rehearing en banc, but corrects its earlier statement of the standard of review....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: